What Is Maximus, Inc. (MMS) Worth in 2026?
According to the CirclFi Deep Alpha Valuation Engine, our multi-model framework produces a cautiously optimistic read on Maximus, Inc. at $57.60. With an estimated intrinsic value of $75.09 and 7 of 12 models pointing higher, the average implied return is +30.4%. The most optimistic model, RCMH-DCF, places fair value at $157.43 (+173.3%), while Markov DDM — the most conservative — estimates $13.68 (-76.2%). This +249.6% gap reflects genuine analytical uncertainty about Maximus, Inc.'s intrinsic worth. Among models with highest confidence, EPV lean bearish — adding weight to the bearish side of the thesis.
What Do the Models Say About MMS?
12 of 13 models are currently active for MMS. Of these, 8 models suggest upside while 4 models suggest overvaluation. The Bayesian DCF estimates MMS's intrinsic value at $118.32, implying +105.4% upside from the current price. See which stocks rank higher →
How Does MMS Rank in Services-Business Services, NEC?
Among 97 Services-Business Services, NEC stocks, MMS ranks #41 by Quality of Company score. CirclFi's QOC score of 7.9/10 evaluates 32 fundamental signals. A score of 7.9 indicates above-average quality.
See all Most Undervalued Services-Business Services, NEC Stocks →
Maximus, Inc. operates in a competitive landscape where fundamental quality metrics are key differentiators for long-term value creation.
Is MMS a Value Trap?
CirclFi's Value Trap algorithm assigns MMS a score of 17/100 (SAFE). This indicates minimal risk. Fundamentals are healthy. The score cross-references apparent undervaluation against fundamental deterioration signals. Browse lowest value-trap stocks →
Multi-Model Methodology
12 of 13 models are active for Maximus, Inc.. Broad coverage provides high confidence. Each model applies a fundamentally different valuation philosophy. See the complete methodology →
According to the CirclFi 32-factor quality framework, Maximus, Inc.'s fundamental quality profile registers 7.9/10. This robust score captures the company's profitability depth, growth consistency, balance sheet resilience, and shareholder return track record.
The gap between the most bullish and bearish model spans +249.6% — demonstrating why single-model analysis is dangerous. Browse all stocks with 13-model coverage →
Data Sources & Confidence
Every MMS valuation is built from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings — 700+ standardized financial tags. Macroeconomic context from FRED calibrates discount rates, while GDELT news sentiment feeds into our Sentiment SOTP model. All pipelines run daily. Read the complete data methodology →
Across MMS's 12 active models, average confidence is 49%. Lower confidence may reflect limited history or high volatility.
CirclFi's output is a research starting point, not a buy/sell signal. All data updates daily. Read the full methodology →