UAA vs VNCE

Under Armour, Inc. vs Vince Holding Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

UAA

Apparel Manufacturing
Under Armour, Inc.
Quality
5.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$5.99
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

VNCE

Apparel Manufacturing
Vince Holding Corp.
Quality
7.0
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$4.30
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType UAA Fair ValueUAA Upside VNCE Fair ValueVNCE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.63 -89.5% $6.92 +61.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $10.36 +64.7% $7.53 +75.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for UAA vs VNCE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

UAA vs VNCE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

VNCE scores higher with a 7.0/10 quality rating vs UAA's 5.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and Vince Holding Corp. (VNCE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

UAA currently trades at $5.99 with a QOC of 5.2/10, while VNCE trades at $4.30 with a QOC of 7.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).