TUSK vs WTTR

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. vs Select Water Solutions, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

TUSK

Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
Quality
5.0
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$3.35
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

WTTR

Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC
Select Water Solutions, Inc.
Quality
6.0
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$17.93
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType TUSK Fair ValueTUSK Upside WTTR Fair ValueWTTR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.63 -51.4% $2.26 -88.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.67 -81.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $3.63 +8.4% $2.12 -88.2%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for TUSK vs WTTR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

TUSK vs WTTR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WTTR scores higher with a 6.0/10 quality rating vs TUSK's 5.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) and Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

TUSK currently trades at $3.35 with a QOC of 5.0/10, while WTTR trades at $17.93 with a QOC of 6.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).