TITN vs XMTR

Titan Machinery Inc. vs Xometry, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

TITN

Industrial Distribution
Titan Machinery Inc.
Quality
7.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$21.73
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

XMTR

Industrial Distribution
Xometry, Inc.
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
31
LOW
Price
$95.32
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType TITN Fair ValueTITN Upside XMTR Fair ValueXMTR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $40.35 +85.7% $15.87 -71.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.19 -93.6% $8.63 -82.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for TITN vs XMTR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

TITN vs XMTR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TITN scores higher with a 7.5/10 quality rating vs XMTR's 6.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Titan Machinery Inc. (TITN) and Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

TITN currently trades at $21.73 with a QOC of 7.5/10, while XMTR trades at $95.32 with a QOC of 6.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).