TGS vs USAC

Transportadora de Gas del Sur S vs USA Compression Partners, LP — Valuation Comparison 2026

TGS

Natural Gas Transmission
Transportadora de Gas del Sur S
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$31.08
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

USAC

Natural Gas Transmission
USA Compression Partners, LP
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$27.53
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType TGS Fair ValueTGS Upside USAC Fair ValueUSAC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.37 -85.9% $19.99 -27.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $12.87 -58.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $47.84 +53.9% $20.11 -26.9%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for TGS vs USAC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

TGS vs USAC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TGS scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs USAC's 6.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Transportadora de Gas del Sur S (TGS) and USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

TGS currently trades at $31.08 with a QOC of 8.7/10, while USAC trades at $27.53 with a QOC of 6.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).