SRPT vs STOK

Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. vs Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SRPT

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Quality
7.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$17.87
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

STOK

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Stoke Therapeutics, Inc.
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$30.91
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SRPT Fair ValueSRPT Upside STOK Fair ValueSTOK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.07 -94.0% $11.28 -63.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.59 -77.4% $6.33 -81.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SRPT vs STOK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SRPT vs STOK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SRPT scores higher with a 7.5/10 quality rating vs STOK's 6.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) and Stoke Therapeutics, Inc. (STOK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SRPT currently trades at $17.87 with a QOC of 7.5/10, while STOK trades at $30.91 with a QOC of 6.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).