SPRY vs SUPN

ARS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SPRY

Pharmaceutical Preparations
ARS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$9.07
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

SUPN

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
33
LOW
Price
$46.18
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SPRY Fair ValueSPRY Upside SUPN Fair ValueSUPN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.86 -79.5% $17.17 -62.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $16.57 -64.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $1.53 -83.1% $10.76 -76.7%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SPRY vs SUPN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SPRY vs SUPN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SUPN scores higher with a 7.8/10 quality rating vs SPRY's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing ARS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SPRY) and Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SUPN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SPRY currently trades at $9.07 with a QOC of 4.7/10, while SUPN trades at $46.18 with a QOC of 7.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).