SPB vs UG

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. vs United-Guardian, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

SPB

Household & Personal Products
Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$78.46
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

UG

Household & Personal Products
United-Guardian, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$7.02
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SPB Fair ValueSPB Upside UG Fair ValueUG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $62.43 -20.4% $4.83 -31.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $67.75 -13.6% $2.74 -60.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SPB vs UG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SPB vs UG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SPB scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs UG's 8.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB) and United-Guardian, Inc. (UG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SPB currently trades at $78.46 with a QOC of 8.7/10, while UG trades at $7.02 with a QOC of 8.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).