SAFT vs STC

Safety Insurance Group, Inc. vs Stewart Information Services Co — Valuation Comparison 2026

SAFT

Insurance - Property & Casualty
Safety Insurance Group, Inc.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$70.47
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

STC

Insurance - Property & Casualty
Stewart Information Services Co
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
33
LOW
Price
$66.11
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType SAFT Fair ValueSAFT Upside STC Fair ValueSTC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $86.21 +22.3% $97.18 +47.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $30.37 -56.9% $15.24 -77.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for SAFT vs STC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

SAFT vs STC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

STC scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs SAFT's 8.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (SAFT) and Stewart Information Services Co (STC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

SAFT currently trades at $70.47 with a QOC of 8.1/10, while STC trades at $66.11 with a QOC of 8.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).