ROST vs TJX

Ross Stores, Inc. vs TJX Companies, Inc. (The) — Valuation Comparison 2026

ROST

Apparel Retail
Ross Stores, Inc.
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$227.20
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

TJX

Apparel Retail
TJX Companies, Inc. (The)
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$154.89
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ROST Fair ValueROST Upside TJX Fair ValueTJX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $64.49 -71.6% $63.83 -58.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $42.67 -81.2% $26.03 -83.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ROST vs TJX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ROST vs TJX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TJX scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs ROST's 8.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) and TJX Companies, Inc. (The) (TJX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ROST currently trades at $227.20 with a QOC of 8.9/10, while TJX trades at $154.89 with a QOC of 9.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).