RILYL vs TREE

BRC Group Holdings, Inc. - Depo vs LendingTree, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

RILYL

Financial Conglomerates
BRC Group Holdings, Inc. - Depo
Quality
5.3
out of 10
Value Trap
42
WARN
Price
$16.75
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

TREE

Financial Conglomerates
LendingTree, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$38.45
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RILYL Fair ValueRILYL Upside TREE Fair ValueTREE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $13.54 -64.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $25.49 +81.9% $51.87 +34.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $12.56 -10.4% $40.86 +6.3%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RILYL vs TREE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RILYL vs TREE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TREE scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs RILYL's 5.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing BRC Group Holdings, Inc. - Depo (RILYL) and LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RILYL currently trades at $16.75 with a QOC of 5.3/10, while TREE trades at $38.45 with a QOC of 8.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).