REXR vs RWT

Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. vs Redwood Trust, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

REXR

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$35.47
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

RWT

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Redwood Trust, Inc.
Quality
5.3
out of 10
Value Trap
22
SAFE
Price
$5.42
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType REXR Fair ValueREXR Upside RWT Fair ValueRWT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.02 -97.1% $1.11 -79.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.38 -41.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $25.23 -28.9% $6.45 +21.8%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for REXR vs RWT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

REXR vs RWT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

REXR scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs RWT's 5.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR) and Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

REXR currently trades at $35.47 with a QOC of 8.5/10, while RWT trades at $5.42 with a QOC of 5.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).