RBC vs TKR

RBC Bearings Incorporated vs Timken Company (The) — Valuation Comparison 2026

RBC

Ball & Roller Bearings
RBC Bearings Incorporated
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$571.96
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

TKR

Ball & Roller Bearings
Timken Company (The)
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$127.98
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RBC Fair ValueRBC Upside TKR Fair ValueTKR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $142.23 -75.1% $17.24 -86.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $53.71 -90.6% $20.74 -83.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RBC vs TKR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RBC vs TKR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

RBC scores higher with a 8.1/10 quality rating vs TKR's 6.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) and Timken Company (The) (TKR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RBC currently trades at $571.96 with a QOC of 8.1/10, while TKR trades at $127.98 with a QOC of 6.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).