Is PUMP or TUSK more undervalued in 2026?

CirclFi compares ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) using 13 institutional-grade valuation models. PUMP has a Quality of Company score of 6.8/10 while TUSK scores 5.0/10.

Which is a better buy — PUMP or TUSK?

Compare intrinsic values from 13 independent models against current market prices. CirclFi also calculates Value Trap scores. This is not financial advice — conduct your own analysis.

How do PUMP and TUSK valuations compare?

PUMP at $15.26 and TUSK at $3.35 are compared across Bayesian DCF, EPV, EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, and 8 additional models.

PUMP vs TUSK Valuation Comparison 2026 — Intrinsic Value Analysis

PUMP

Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC

ProPetro Holding Corp.

Quality

6.8

out of 10

Value Trap

SAFE

Price

$15.26

Last close

Models

13/13

Active

TUSK

Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.

Quality

5.0

out of 10

Value Trap

LOW

Price

$3.35

Last close

Models

9/13

Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

Model	Type	PUMP Fair Value	PUMP Upside	TUSK Fair Value	TUSK Upside
Bayesian DCF	Intrinsic	$2.43	-84.1%	$1.63	-51.4%
Earnings Power Value	Intrinsic	$3.93	-74.2%	—	—
EROIC Spread	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
First Chicago	Scenario	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Markov DDM	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
ML-RIV	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Dynamic NAV	Asset-Based	$3.97	-74.0%	$3.63	+8.4%
PWERM	Option-Based	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Sentiment SOTP	Hybrid	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
CUCE Ensemble	Ensemble	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
FTNN Topology	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
RCMH-DCF	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%

🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PUMP vs TUSK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PUMP vs TUSK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PUMP scores higher with a 6.8/10 quality rating vs TUSK's 5.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PUMP currently trades at $15.26 with a QOC of 6.8/10, while TUSK trades at $3.35 with a QOC of 5.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).