PHM vs TOL

PulteGroup, Inc. vs Toll Brothers, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

PHM

Operative Builders
PulteGroup, Inc.
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$118.18
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

TOL

Operative Builders
Toll Brothers, Inc.
Quality
9.4
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$138.54
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PHM Fair ValuePHM Upside TOL Fair ValueTOL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $83.77 -29.1% $241.20 +74.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $70.23 -40.6% $99.14 -28.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PHM vs TOL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PHM vs TOL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PHM scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs TOL's 9.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) and Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PHM currently trades at $118.18 with a QOC of 9.7/10, while TOL trades at $138.54 with a QOC of 9.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).