PENG vs SAIC

Penguin Solutions, Inc. vs Science Applications Internatio — Valuation Comparison 2026

PENG

Information Technology Services
Penguin Solutions, Inc.
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
38
LOW
Price
$54.07
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

SAIC

Information Technology Services
Science Applications Internatio
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
5
SAFE
Price
$103.70
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PENG Fair ValuePENG Upside SAIC Fair ValueSAIC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $21.42 -60.4% $160.03 +54.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $11.53 -78.7% $9.40 -90.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PENG vs SAIC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PENG vs SAIC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SAIC scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs PENG's 7.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG) and Science Applications Internatio (SAIC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PENG currently trades at $54.07 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while SAIC trades at $103.70 with a QOC of 9.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).