PDLB vs PFIS

Ponce Financial Group, Inc. vs Peoples Financial Services Corp — Valuation Comparison 2026

PDLB

Banks - Regional
Ponce Financial Group, Inc.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$18.81
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

PFIS

Banks - Regional
Peoples Financial Services Corp
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$60.03
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PDLB Fair ValuePDLB Upside PFIS Fair ValuePFIS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.49 -74.7% $22.17 -63.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $64.20 +7.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $1.34 -92.8% $42.35 -29.5%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PDLB vs PFIS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PDLB vs PFIS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PDLB scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs PFIS's 7.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ponce Financial Group, Inc. (PDLB) and Peoples Financial Services Corp (PFIS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PDLB currently trades at $18.81 with a QOC of 9.3/10, while PFIS trades at $60.03 with a QOC of 7.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).