PATK vs PHIN

Patrick Industries, Inc. vs PHINIA Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

PATK

Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories
Patrick Industries, Inc.
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$90.52
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

PHIN

Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories
PHINIA Inc.
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$77.26
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PATK Fair ValuePATK Upside PHIN Fair ValuePHIN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $140.04 +54.7% $83.09 +7.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $13.06 -85.6% $14.61 -81.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PATK vs PHIN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PATK vs PHIN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PATK scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs PHIN's 8.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) and PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PATK currently trades at $90.52 with a QOC of 9.2/10, while PHIN trades at $77.26 with a QOC of 8.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).