PARR vs PED

Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. Comm vs Pedevco Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

PARR

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. Comm
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$56.16
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

PED

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Pedevco Corp.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$12.85
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PARR Fair ValuePARR Upside PED Fair ValuePED Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $56.41 +0.4% $11.92 -7.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $74.06 +31.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $162.02 +188.5% $25.99 +102.2%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PARR vs PED — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PARR vs PED — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PARR scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs PED's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. Comm (PARR) and Pedevco Corp. (PED) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PARR currently trades at $56.16 with a QOC of 9.6/10, while PED trades at $12.85 with a QOC of 5.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).