ORLY vs SES

O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. vs SES AI Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

ORLY

Auto Parts
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
Quality
9.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$89.23
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

SES

Auto Parts
SES AI Corporation
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$1.38
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ORLY Fair ValueORLY Upside SES Fair ValueSES Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $30.42 -65.9% $0.43 -68.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $17.22 -80.7% $0.63 -40.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ORLY vs SES — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ORLY vs SES — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ORLY scores higher with a 9.5/10 quality rating vs SES's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (ORLY) and SES AI Corporation (SES) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ORLY currently trades at $89.23 with a QOC of 9.5/10, while SES trades at $1.38 with a QOC of 4.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).