ONBPO vs PNBK

Old National Bancorp - Deposita vs Patriot National Bancorp Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ONBPO

National Commercial Banks
Old National Bancorp - Deposita
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$24.95
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

PNBK

National Commercial Banks
Patriot National Bancorp Inc.
Quality
5.2
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$1.12
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ONBPO Fair ValueONBPO Upside PNBK Fair ValuePNBK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.10 -83.6% $0.53 -52.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $20.04 -19.7% $2.72 +130.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ONBPO vs PNBK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ONBPO vs PNBK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ONBPO scores higher with a 6.9/10 quality rating vs PNBK's 5.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Old National Bancorp - Deposita (ONBPO) and Patriot National Bancorp Inc. (PNBK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ONBPO currently trades at $24.95 with a QOC of 6.9/10, while PNBK trades at $1.12 with a QOC of 5.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).