OBE vs PARR

Obsidian Energy Ltd. vs Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. Comm — Valuation Comparison 2026

OBE

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Obsidian Energy Ltd.
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$10.95
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

PARR

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. Comm
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$56.16
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType OBE Fair ValueOBE Upside PARR Fair ValuePARR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.35 -69.4% $56.41 +0.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $74.06 +31.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $15.84 +25.2% $162.02 +188.5%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for OBE vs PARR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

OBE vs PARR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PARR scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs OBE's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Obsidian Energy Ltd. (OBE) and Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. Comm (PARR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

OBE currently trades at $10.95 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while PARR trades at $56.16 with a QOC of 9.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).