NPK vs RCAT

National Presto Industries, Inc vs Red Cat Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

NPK

Aerospace & Defense
National Presto Industries, Inc
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$132.00
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

RCAT

Aerospace & Defense
Red Cat Holdings, Inc.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$14.15
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NPK Fair ValueNPK Upside RCAT Fair ValueRCAT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $19.18 -85.5% $4.68 -66.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $29.56 -77.6% $1.78 -84.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NPK vs RCAT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NPK vs RCAT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NPK scores higher with a 7.9/10 quality rating vs RCAT's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing National Presto Industries, Inc (NPK) and Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NPK currently trades at $132.00 with a QOC of 7.9/10, while RCAT trades at $14.15 with a QOC of 5.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).