NOA vs RNGR

North American Construction Gro vs Ranger Energy Services, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

NOA

Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC
North American Construction Gro
Quality
6.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$13.83
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

RNGR

Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC
Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$15.46
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NOA Fair ValueNOA Upside RNGR Fair ValueRNGR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $18.80 +35.9% $17.51 +13.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.75 -88.1% $5.82 -62.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NOA vs RNGR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NOA vs RNGR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

RNGR scores higher with a 8.1/10 quality rating vs NOA's 6.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing North American Construction Gro (NOA) and Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NOA currently trades at $13.83 with a QOC of 6.7/10, while RNGR trades at $15.46 with a QOC of 8.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).