NOA vs RCON

North American Construction Gro vs Recon Technology, Ltd. — Valuation Comparison 2026

NOA

Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC
North American Construction Gro
Quality
6.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$13.83
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

RCON

Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC
Recon Technology, Ltd.
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$0.59
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NOA Fair ValueNOA Upside RCON Fair ValueRCON Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $18.80 +35.9% $0.24 -59.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.75 -88.1% $2.01 +122.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NOA vs RCON — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NOA vs RCON — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NOA scores higher with a 6.7/10 quality rating vs RCON's 5.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing North American Construction Gro (NOA) and Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NOA currently trades at $13.83 with a QOC of 6.7/10, while RCON trades at $0.59 with a QOC of 5.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).