NMRK vs OPEN

Newmark Group, Inc. vs Opendoor Technologies Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

NMRK

Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)
Newmark Group, Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
34
LOW
Price
$13.97
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

OPEN

Real Estate Agents & Managers (For Others)
Opendoor Technologies Inc
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$5.04
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NMRK Fair ValueNMRK Upside OPEN Fair ValueOPEN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $19.04 +36.3% $10.41 +106.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $7.97 -42.9% $0.60 -89.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NMRK vs OPEN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NMRK vs OPEN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NMRK scores higher with a 7.7/10 quality rating vs OPEN's 6.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) and Opendoor Technologies Inc (OPEN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NMRK currently trades at $13.97 with a QOC of 7.7/10, while OPEN trades at $5.04 with a QOC of 6.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).