NBIX vs NVAX

Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs Novavax, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

NBIX

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$158.30
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

NVAX

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Novavax, Inc.
Quality
6.4
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$10.97
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NBIX Fair ValueNBIX Upside NVAX Fair ValueNVAX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $121.09 -23.5% $1.33 -87.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $34.99 -77.9% $2.46 -69.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NBIX vs NVAX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NBIX vs NVAX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NBIX scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs NVAX's 6.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) and Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NBIX currently trades at $158.30 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while NVAX trades at $10.97 with a QOC of 6.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).