NBHC vs NIC

National Bank Holdings Corporat vs Nicolet Bankshares Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

NBHC

Banks - Regional
National Bank Holdings Corporat
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$41.94
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

NIC

Banks - Regional
Nicolet Bankshares Inc.
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
15
SAFE
Price
$140.50
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NBHC Fair ValueNBHC Upside NIC Fair ValueNIC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $21.78 -48.1% $52.21 -62.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $28.08 -33.0% $76.54 -45.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NBHC vs NIC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NBHC vs NIC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NIC scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs NBHC's 8.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing National Bank Holdings Corporat (NBHC) and Nicolet Bankshares Inc. (NIC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NBHC currently trades at $41.94 with a QOC of 8.4/10, while NIC trades at $140.50 with a QOC of 9.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).