NAMM vs NEM

Namib Minerals vs Newmont Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

NAMM

Gold
Namib Minerals
Quality
6.1
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.45
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

NEM

Gold
Newmont Corporation
Quality
9.9
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$108.23
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NAMM Fair ValueNAMM Upside NEM Fair ValueNEM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.22 -85.0% $87.59 -19.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $70.22 -35.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $1.45 -0.2% $200.67 +85.4%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NAMM vs NEM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NAMM vs NEM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NEM scores higher with a 9.9/10 quality rating vs NAMM's 6.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Namib Minerals (NAMM) and Newmont Corporation (NEM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NAMM currently trades at $1.45 with a QOC of 6.1/10, while NEM trades at $108.23 with a QOC of 9.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).