MTW vs OSK

Manitowoc Company, Inc. (The) vs Oshkosh Corporation (Holding Co — Valuation Comparison 2026

MTW

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
Manitowoc Company, Inc. (The)
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
16
SAFE
Price
$12.06
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

OSK

Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
Oshkosh Corporation (Holding Co
Quality
4.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$129.65
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MTW Fair ValueMTW Upside OSK Fair ValueOSK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.76 -93.4% $58.15 -55.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $60.21 -53.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $16.16 +34.0% $74.60 -42.5%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MTW vs OSK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MTW vs OSK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MTW scores higher with a 6.8/10 quality rating vs OSK's 4.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Manitowoc Company, Inc. (The) (MTW) and Oshkosh Corporation (Holding Co (OSK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MTW currently trades at $12.06 with a QOC of 6.8/10, while OSK trades at $129.65 with a QOC of 4.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).