MTR vs TPL

Mesa Royalty Trust vs Texas Pacific Land Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

MTR

Oil Royalty Traders
Mesa Royalty Trust
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$3.79
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

TPL

Oil Royalty Traders
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
Quality
9.4
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$393.00
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MTR Fair ValueMTR Upside TPL Fair ValueTPL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.01 -73.4% $141.28 -64.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $83.21 -78.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $2.85 -33.3% $208.29 -47.0%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MTR vs TPL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MTR vs TPL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TPL scores higher with a 9.4/10 quality rating vs MTR's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Mesa Royalty Trust (MTR) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MTR currently trades at $3.79 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while TPL trades at $393.00 with a QOC of 9.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).