MRCY vs PEW

Mercury Systems Inc vs GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

MRCY

Aerospace & Defense
Mercury Systems Inc
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$108.11
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

PEW

Aerospace & Defense
GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc.
Quality
5.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$2.75
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MRCY Fair ValueMRCY Upside PEW Fair ValuePEW Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $17.17 -84.1% $2.61 -5.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $17.15 -84.1% $5.64 +91.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MRCY vs PEW — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MRCY vs PEW — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MRCY scores higher with a 7.9/10 quality rating vs PEW's 5.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Mercury Systems Inc (MRCY) and GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc. (PEW) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MRCY currently trades at $108.11 with a QOC of 7.9/10, while PEW trades at $2.75 with a QOC of 5.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).