MLM vs SMID

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. vs Smith-Midland Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

MLM

Building Materials
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
14
SAFE
Price
$575.14
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

SMID

Building Materials
Smith-Midland Corporation
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$32.42
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MLM Fair ValueMLM Upside SMID Fair ValueSMID Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $155.50 -73.0% $8.94 -72.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $62.04 -89.9% $12.39 -61.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MLM vs SMID — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MLM vs SMID — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SMID scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs MLM's 7.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) and Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MLM currently trades at $575.14 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while SMID trades at $32.42 with a QOC of 9.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).