MGM vs PK

MGM Resorts International vs Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

MGM

Hotels & Motels
MGM Resorts International
Quality
5.8
out of 10
Value Trap
45
WARN
Price
$43.67
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

PK

Hotels & Motels
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
Quality
5.0
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$12.13
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MGM Fair ValueMGM Upside PK Fair ValuePK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $78.52 +103.9% $4.44 -60.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $50.58 +31.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $17.07 -60.9% $10.82 -10.8%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MGM vs PK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MGM vs PK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MGM scores higher with a 5.8/10 quality rating vs PK's 5.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing MGM Resorts International (MGM) and Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MGM currently trades at $43.67 with a QOC of 5.8/10, while PK trades at $12.13 with a QOC of 5.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).