MAR vs MSC

Marriott International vs Studio City International Holdi — Valuation Comparison 2026

MAR

Hotels & Motels
Marriott International
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$375.60
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

MSC

Hotels & Motels
Studio City International Holdi
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$2.39
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MAR Fair ValueMAR Upside MSC Fair ValueMSC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $175.34 -53.3% $5.93 +148.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $136.34 -63.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $357.58 -4.8% $4.52 +89.3%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MAR vs MSC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MAR vs MSC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MAR scores higher with a 8.6/10 quality rating vs MSC's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Marriott International (MAR) and Studio City International Holdi (MSC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MAR currently trades at $375.60 with a QOC of 8.6/10, while MSC trades at $2.39 with a QOC of 5.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).