LPRO vs NAVI

Open Lending Corporation vs Navient Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

LPRO

Credit Services
Open Lending Corporation
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$2.29
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

NAVI

Credit Services
Navient Corporation
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$8.31
Last close
Models
2/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LPRO Fair ValueLPRO Upside NAVI Fair ValueNAVI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $5.39 +135.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $7.75 +337.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $4.53 +97.8% $16.86 +102.9%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $1.74 -2.2% $10.92 +31.9%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LPRO vs NAVI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LPRO vs NAVI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LPRO scores higher with a 7.2/10 quality rating vs NAVI's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) and Navient Corporation (NAVI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LPRO currently trades at $2.29 with a QOC of 7.2/10, while NAVI trades at $8.31 with a QOC of 5.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).