LMT vs MRCY

Lockheed Martin Corporation vs Mercury Systems Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

LMT

Aerospace & Defense
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
14
SAFE
Price
$537.21
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

MRCY

Aerospace & Defense
Mercury Systems Inc
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$108.11
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LMT Fair ValueLMT Upside MRCY Fair ValueMRCY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $334.13 -37.8% $17.17 -84.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $126.62 -76.4% $17.15 -84.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LMT vs MRCY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LMT vs MRCY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LMT scores higher with a 8.4/10 quality rating vs MRCY's 7.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) and Mercury Systems Inc (MRCY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LMT currently trades at $537.21 with a QOC of 8.4/10, while MRCY trades at $108.11 with a QOC of 7.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).