LIDR vs PATK

AEye, Inc. vs Patrick Industries, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

LIDR

Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories
AEye, Inc.
Quality
5.3
out of 10
Value Trap
41
WARN
Price
$2.00
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

PATK

Motor Vehicle Parts & Accessories
Patrick Industries, Inc.
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$90.52
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LIDR Fair ValueLIDR Upside PATK Fair ValuePATK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.02 -49.0% $140.04 +54.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $13.06 -85.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $2.31 +15.5%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LIDR vs PATK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LIDR vs PATK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PATK scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs LIDR's 5.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing AEye, Inc. (LIDR) and Patrick Industries, Inc. (PATK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LIDR currently trades at $2.00 with a QOC of 5.3/10, while PATK trades at $90.52 with a QOC of 9.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).