KTOS vs LOAR

Kratos Defense & Security Solut vs Loar Holdings Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

KTOS

Aerospace & Defense
Kratos Defense & Security Solut
Quality
8.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$65.19
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

LOAR

Aerospace & Defense
Loar Holdings Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
5
SAFE
Price
$65.19
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KTOS Fair ValueKTOS Upside LOAR Fair ValueLOAR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.59 -93.0% $8.11 -87.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.44 -90.1% $0.72 -98.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KTOS vs LOAR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KTOS vs LOAR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KTOS scores higher with a 8.0/10 quality rating vs LOAR's 7.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Kratos Defense & Security Solut (KTOS) and Loar Holdings Inc. (LOAR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KTOS currently trades at $65.19 with a QOC of 8.0/10, while LOAR trades at $65.19 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).