KRMN vs LOAR

Karman Holdings Inc. vs Loar Holdings Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

KRMN

Aerospace & Defense
Karman Holdings Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$65.86
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

LOAR

Aerospace & Defense
Loar Holdings Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
5
SAFE
Price
$65.19
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KRMN Fair ValueKRMN Upside LOAR Fair ValueLOAR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $8.11 -87.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.53 -97.5% $0.72 -98.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $1.49 -97.7% $17.50 -73.2%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KRMN vs LOAR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KRMN vs LOAR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LOAR scores higher with a 7.7/10 quality rating vs KRMN's 7.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Karman Holdings Inc. (KRMN) and Loar Holdings Inc. (LOAR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KRMN currently trades at $65.86 with a QOC of 7.7/10, while LOAR trades at $65.19 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).