KOP vs LPX

Koppers Holdings Inc. vs Louisiana-Pacific Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

KOP

Lumber & Wood Products (No Furniture)
Koppers Holdings Inc.
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
10
SAFE
Price
$40.80
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

LPX

Lumber & Wood Products (No Furniture)
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$76.38
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KOP Fair ValueKOP Upside LPX Fair ValueLPX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $15.04 -62.7% $19.56 -74.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $14.34 -64.9% $15.24 -80.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KOP vs LPX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KOP vs LPX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KOP scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs LPX's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Koppers Holdings Inc. (KOP) and Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KOP currently trades at $40.80 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while LPX trades at $76.38 with a QOC of 4.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).