KNSA vs NBIX

Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Interna vs Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

KNSA

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Interna
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$50.84
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

NBIX

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$156.39
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KNSA Fair ValueKNSA Upside NBIX Fair ValueNBIX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $6.16 -87.9% $121.05 -22.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $9.70 -80.9% $34.99 -77.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KNSA vs NBIX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KNSA vs NBIX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NBIX scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs KNSA's 5.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals Interna (KNSA) and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KNSA currently trades at $50.84 with a QOC of 5.5/10, while NBIX trades at $156.39 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).