KLAC vs OPTX

KLA Corporation vs Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

KLAC

Optical Instruments & Lenses
KLA Corporation
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$1921.71
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

OPTX

Optical Instruments & Lenses
Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc.
Quality
5.8
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$9.95
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KLAC Fair ValueKLAC Upside OPTX Fair ValueOPTX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $539.30 -71.9% $0.15 -98.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $343.05 -82.1% $0.11 -98.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KLAC vs OPTX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KLAC vs OPTX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KLAC scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs OPTX's 5.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing KLA Corporation (KLAC) and Syntec Optics Holdings, Inc. (OPTX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KLAC currently trades at $1921.71 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while OPTX trades at $9.95 with a QOC of 5.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).