KGEI vs MGY

Kolibri Global Energy Inc. vs Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

KGEI

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Kolibri Global Energy Inc.
Quality
6.7
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$5.12
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

MGY

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$27.36
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KGEI Fair ValueKGEI Upside MGY Fair ValueMGY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $12.86 +151.2% $59.83 +118.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.05 -40.5% $18.11 -33.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KGEI vs MGY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KGEI vs MGY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MGY scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs KGEI's 6.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KGEI) and Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation (MGY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KGEI currently trades at $5.12 with a QOC of 6.7/10, while MGY trades at $27.36 with a QOC of 9.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).