JILL vs LULU

J. Jill, Inc. vs lululemon athletica inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

JILL

Apparel Retail
J. Jill, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$13.26
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

LULU

Apparel Retail
lululemon athletica inc.
Quality
9.1
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$131.33
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JILL Fair ValueJILL Upside LULU Fair ValueLULU Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $24.98 +88.4% $132.97 +1.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $21.19 +59.8% $87.07 -33.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JILL vs LULU — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JILL vs LULU — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LULU scores higher with a 9.1/10 quality rating vs JILL's 8.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing J. Jill, Inc. (JILL) and lululemon athletica inc. (LULU) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JILL currently trades at $13.26 with a QOC of 8.5/10, while LULU trades at $131.33 with a QOC of 9.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).