JF vs LPRO

J and Friends Holdings Limited vs Open Lending Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

JF

Credit Services
J and Friends Holdings Limited
Quality
2.9
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$1.01
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

LPRO

Credit Services
Open Lending Corporation
Quality
7.2
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$2.29
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JF Fair ValueJF Upside LPRO Fair ValueLPRO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.20 -80.3% $5.39 +135.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.31 -69.7% $7.75 +337.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JF vs LPRO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JF vs LPRO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LPRO scores higher with a 7.2/10 quality rating vs JF's 2.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing J and Friends Holdings Limited (JF) and Open Lending Corporation (LPRO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JF currently trades at $1.01 with a QOC of 2.9/10, while LPRO trades at $2.29 with a QOC of 7.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).