JAZZ vs JNJ

Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc vs Johnson & Johnson — Valuation Comparison 2026

JAZZ

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc
Quality
7.5
out of 10
Value Trap
15
SAFE
Price
$236.49
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

JNJ

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Johnson & Johnson
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$225.33
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JAZZ Fair ValueJAZZ Upside JNJ Fair ValueJNJ Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $352.09 +48.9% $76.89 -65.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $50.60 -77.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $108.93 -44.6% $33.23 -85.3%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JAZZ vs JNJ — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JAZZ vs JNJ — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

JNJ scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs JAZZ's 7.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc (JAZZ) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JAZZ currently trades at $236.49 with a QOC of 7.5/10, while JNJ trades at $225.33 with a QOC of 9.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).