ISSC vs KRMN

Innovative Solutions and Suppor vs Karman Holdings Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ISSC

Aerospace & Defense
Innovative Solutions and Suppor
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$16.82
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

KRMN

Aerospace & Defense
Karman Holdings Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$65.86
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ISSC Fair ValueISSC Upside KRMN Fair ValueKRMN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.94 -76.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.93 -70.7% $1.53 -97.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $5.16 -69.4% $1.49 -97.7%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ISSC vs KRMN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ISSC vs KRMN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ISSC scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs KRMN's 7.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Innovative Solutions and Suppor (ISSC) and Karman Holdings Inc. (KRMN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ISSC currently trades at $16.82 with a QOC of 9.3/10, while KRMN trades at $65.86 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).