ISSC vs KITT

Innovative Solutions and Suppor vs Nauticus Robotics, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ISSC

Aerospace & Defense
Innovative Solutions and Suppor
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$16.82
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

KITT

Aerospace & Defense
Nauticus Robotics, Inc.
Quality
3.3
out of 10
Value Trap
37
LOW
Price
$1.72
Last close
Models
3/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ISSC Fair ValueISSC Upside KITT Fair ValueKITT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.94 -76.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.93 -70.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $1.20 -94.4% $0.11 -93.6%
PWERM Option-Based $17.38 +3.3% $5.84 +239.7%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ISSC vs KITT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ISSC vs KITT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ISSC scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs KITT's 3.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Innovative Solutions and Suppor (ISSC) and Nauticus Robotics, Inc. (KITT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ISSC currently trades at $16.82 with a QOC of 9.3/10, while KITT trades at $1.72 with a QOC of 3.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).