IPAR vs KMB

Interparfums, Inc. vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

IPAR

Household & Personal Products
Interparfums, Inc.
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
10
SAFE
Price
$96.40
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

KMB

Household & Personal Products
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
14
SAFE
Price
$100.14
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType IPAR Fair ValueIPAR Upside KMB Fair ValueKMB Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $30.83 -68.0% $47.67 -52.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $40.26 -58.2% $30.35 -69.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for IPAR vs KMB — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

IPAR vs KMB — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IPAR scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs KMB's 8.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Interparfums, Inc. (IPAR) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

IPAR currently trades at $96.40 with a QOC of 9.7/10, while KMB trades at $100.14 with a QOC of 8.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).